Canadian Dimension - For people who want to change the world Subscribe Now!
CD blog

Lighten up? Canada’s perilous and intolerable apathy

Canadian Dimension, July 8th, 2008

Conversation gets cut short virtually every time I try to initiate some form of serious discussion with friends. The Canadians I know are some of the most complicit, laissez-faire bunch I have ever met, and they’re only part of a larger national apathy that corrodes any illusion of democracy. I was utterly outraged – on the verge of tears – when a newfound friend of mine told me he had to drop out of school because the provincial government deleted records qualifying him for free transport. His spastic cystic fibrosis leaves the 32 year old bound to his wheelchair for life, and he has been trying to graduate for years despite financial and physical hardships just so he can prove his family he is worth a damn. And the provincial government come along and delete his transport file, setting him back another year before graduation. This never should have happened and the government should be held directly accountable. There was no accountability whatsoever. He’s going back to university in September, but he’s not getting any younger. The province certainly don’t care about his time, and it’s clear they’d rather have him stay home where he is cheapest to take care of. So who does care about his time? Not us. It doesn’t affect us. All I heard from people where apathetic sighs. That’s the government for you, they said to me, what do you expect? I expect more. An awful lot more. And I’ll fight for it, for my buddy, anyway way I can.

I was told tonight that the Canadian economy remains resilient to the U.S. recession because of its vast potash and uranium deposits. Canada is fast becoming an economic powerhouse, someone said to me. I see it first hand as a reporter on the ground watching some of Canada’s fastest growing regions scramble to keep up, and this outrages me as well. Why, in the 21st century, should one of the most developed counties in the world have an excelling economy because it exploits its natural resources with still-untold consequences? We’re in the 21st century, and Canada’s economy is thriving because of potash! An economic powerhouse because it can provide farmers with fertilizer needed to feed the vast corn crops of another failed initiative, ethanol (which all major political parties support). Yet in reply to my anger, I was told that I take things too seriously, that employment is high and people are happy. Sure, I said, but if someone is employed here, someone somewhere else is scraping by. Stop focusing on the negative, I’m told. Nonsense, it’s our responsibility to focus on the negative and do what we can. The everyday things in life are way more than enough to keep me happy.

Time after time people seem more determined to silence anything that may disrupt their peaceful existence when serious issues with serious consequences are unraveling at an unparalleled pace. This isn’t my doomsday declaration by any means, but it is a bloody wakeup call to all of the complicit Canadians I know, and millions I don’t, that seem to revel in this form of Pax Americana. They can sit out on a patio unconcerned after having learned that a man in a wheelchair has just been denied his education; they can enjoy a barbecue while a Columbian peasant learns that the government paid a slap-on-the-wrist stipends after killing one of the peasant’s friends, a unionized coworker (which is going to occur with the new Canada-Columbia Free Trade Agreement). They can do all of those things, and I’d encourage them to do so. I’m the first to be outside enjoying the summer. But don’t tell me to lighten up. No chance, no way and shame on you for your negligence. If you hit the patios one night, protest or petition the next. If you talk about the old days, talk about the dark days too. When are people going to wake up and act? Where is the collective outrage? Well we can’t talk about that. It’s another beautiful summer and best enjoyed on the patios and nightclubs - never mind the cold nights that the silent majority suffer.

* * *

I am getting to know everyday middle-class Canadians very well because of my working environment. As a reporter, I am the link between their respective concerns and the politicians that generally enact their causes (albeit late, over budget and after the issue has come to a head, often with devastating consequences). Working on the ground like this, I also get a good sense of what average middle-class Canadians are lacking.

At all of the municipal council meetings I have covered over the past two years, I have only seen one other person my age (23) in attendance. An environmentalist, he was incredibly well educated at McGill and drove the municipality to protect a green corridor that is facing rapid fragmentation due to development. One person my age in two years! If citizens aren’t interested and active in affairs that directly affect them now, how can Canada possibly hope to have the democratic future it so desperately needs?

My proposal is this: Canada’s apathy has to be broken from the grassroots, but lets take issues to the town hall instead of parliament. At least you get to talk to those elected officials to their face. The war in Afghanistan - take to the suburban streets in mass protest so that local media start to cover the issue. The Canada-Columbia FTA, hold an information session at town hall or in the park to tell parents what the Canadian government is doing. The disconnect between Canadians and their politicians is only widening. Municipal movements can help close that gap and it will also remind Canadians of some of the larger issues that don’t directly affect their communities.

The problem with current left-wing movements is they are concentrated political masses. The idea is to counter power with numbers. But instead of concentrating a protest downtown or on parliment hill, break activists into groups in their immediate region. Not only would transport waste be reduced, protests would also cast a wider net. Instead of being covered by one city newspaper, issues would be covered by the city paper along with all of the surrounding weekly newspapers. Suddenly a local newspaper wouldn’t just be covering council meetings, it would be covering issues of global significance. I hope to start this project in one or two municipalities in the coming years, and expand it within Quebec to see if the idea can work. It’s a lot more exciting than sitting on the above mentioned patio and watching people pass.

If you like the idea or have any advice you can write in the comments field below or email me at matthewjamesbrett@hotmail.com

Canadian Dimension Matthew Brett is the Canadian Dimension weblog editor and a Montreal-based journalist at a weekly newspaper. Read other posts by Canadian Dimension.

11 Comments

  1. Mr. Brett;

    Thanks for writing this important article. I was a journalist in a small weekly (unfortunately bought and shut down by SunMedia Corp to avoid the competition with another of their papers). This was the job I loved most in life because I had the privilege of “covering” municipal councils in the county where I live.

    The most interesting things happen in small municipalities and I believe you are on the right track to involve citizens locally. Encouraging citizens, especially young people to participate at the local level even with global issues is a stroke of genius on your part. I wish you much luck in this endeavour. Although the meetings can be boring, they don’t have to be and often the observer of a town council meeting will see all aspects of the human condition expressed in that venue. What a perfect classroom on democracy! Wouldn’t it be wonderful if school boards could adjust their curriculum to encourage attendance at a town council meeting as part of a homework assignment. Children and young people would learn how to participate in this democracy and this might chip away at the apathy.

    I, too, have often been on the verge of tears at the degree of apathy among my friends and acquaintances. I, too, have been chastized as being dramatic when expressing concern or outrage about a given situation. Friends and family are the worst offenders - often trying to drag me onto that patio!

    Best of luck.

    Deb Prothero

  2. Deb later wrote:

    Your article was the first I’ve read in a long time that offered a practical solution rather than just a complaint about the apathy of the Canadian public. You are definitively not part of the problem but part of the solution.

    - - - -

    Thanks Deb. Too many articles rip into various interested parties and organizations without offering solutions or, more importantly, taking any action themselves. I’m certainly guilty of that myself more often than not.

  3. Dear Mr. Brett,
    It is good of you to be angry about apathy. Apathy is certainly corrosive, both for the mind and spirit. At best it stifles new thoughts and ideas, and at worst, it silently suppresses compassion. Even more corrosive, however, is your apparent attempt to categorize all Canadians as, “Apathetic” or “Laissez- faire”. You speak of countering ideologies, of overturning the “primary definers” or “ruling class ideas”. Yet in defining Canadians simply as an apathetic bunch you immediately dismiss the power individuals have for change, and you dismiss the changes many of them have effected in their own personal lives: in their relationships, financial situations and so on. Charging them merely as “apathetic”, you yourself have become the primary definer of their personal beliefs, and they are left with nothing but to defend against you. This top-down attempt at change renders everyone guilty before they have a chance to present their case (you of course will respond: “they will never present their case because they are apathetic!”) This is the wrong way to go about effecting change in your community. It is as if you want to run through the streets screaming, “get the fuck off your armchairs, lazy people of Canada! Turn off the TVs and pull your kids out of school! The revolution is coming!” As if Dad is going to put down his beer after a 10 hour day taking the train and being at the office in order to write a letter to the government. As if Mom is going to tell Junior to stop eating his broccoli and picket. Though you ended your article with an idea for people, rightly encouraging them to begin and to join municipal movements, your name-calling had already taken its toll. You had already effectively condemned Canadians to your own credence: “we are an apathetic population”, condescending us into a guilty corner of contempt, forcing us now to defend ourselves against your belief that we must justify all the fun we have. Change will never be effected in this way, save if there really were bombs at our doorsteps.
    Even when there are bombs at our doorsteps, people are STILL apathetic. I know because I lived it firsthand. Two years ago, I too was outraged by the lack of Canadian public outrage, by what I perceived as a total inability for people to comprehend the cause-and-effect relationship we have with other beings in this world, the seeming absence of all empathy, the false sense of entitlement our material-and-image-obsessed culture nourishes. So I left. I traveled to a border area where there has been a war for over 60 years and lived in a refugee camp with the 30 000 people there. I found myself in the shadow of what might be coined “Pax Asiana”- millions of Middle Class Asians enjoying their new place in life, buying things, living peacefully, becoming better educated, and stepping all over the less fortunate in an inevitably more direct way than we do due to their proximity with the bulk of the world’s biggest slums and poorest peoples. I lived with some of those poor, and almost (but not quite) surprisingly, I found that this “laissez faire” attitude existed among them as well. For them, unless you were an actual soldier, your involvement in the war was altogether minimal. Although people were dying from the conflict every day, although some neighbours were suffering from hunger and domestic violence and disease, people would worry all the time about what card game to play, or when they would pierce their ears, or who they were in love with that month, who they would marry someday. The landscape of the human psyche, it seems, is enjoyment, no matter what’s going on around the corner. I quickly learned that running around crying “Apathy!” would do no good. Showing people what their personal power could achieve and already had achieved; giving them opportunities to grow and to help; these techniques for winning the war on apathy proved much more useful.
    I am sorry that the world and the human psyche have failed you, Matthew Brett. Your anger comes off as self-righteous rather than constructive; as an accusation rather than a creative initiative. You have framed the issue as “apathy” when truly the issue is: people don’t know their own potential. Canadians have enough to defend against (hunger, debt, exhaustion, sadness, etc.) without you pegging us all as apathetic (and by association, powerless). Give your friends an idea for participation and action, and they may gain confidence in their own power to counter the complicated world around them. Call them lazy and apathetic, and you lose readers, not to mention friends, in any part of the world.

  4. Well said.

    There certainly is a lot of room for debate about how much focus there should be on the municipal level — including municipal government politics — but I do think that there be more of that municipal organizing.

    Here’s a post over at my blog (from a couple of days ago) that touches on similar issues -
    http://tobanblack.net/blog/?p=178

  5. Well said.

    Of course, there is a lot of room for debate about how much focus there should be on the municipal level — including municipal government politics — but I do think that there should be more of that municipal organizing.

    Here’s a post over at my blog (from a couple of days ago) that touches on similar issues -
    http://tobanblack.net/blog/?p=178

  6. Hi Toban,

    Thanks for writing. I read your post. I think I need to clarify the kind of municipal movement I envision.

    The type of movements that you are addressing in your post are similar to the method I’m proposing, but different in a very important way.

    The local movements you address are often concentrated on limited goals. Stopping development in local woodlands or wetlands, for example. Like you say, they’re excellent causes. Everything should be done to encourage these local organizations.

    You do suggest that these scattered local actions don’t address the larger goal. Here I would agree in some respects, and disagree in others, and this is a crucial point. Contrary to your point, local actions certainly are part of a larger movement, and I’m addressing specifically the environmental movement you critique so well. Protecting a local woodland is still protecting the environment. It’s part of the same cause. But I would agree that “local and inter-local approaches which reinforce one another” are required.

    That already exists in my view. Here in Montreal and Quebec we have a number of umbrella organizations that lobby on behalf of their smaller partners. This kind of integration is essential, but unfortunately lacking in a number of social movements.

    A municipal group addressing issues of foreign policy, for example, would integrate itself very well with larger organizations and causes. These issues simply are not addressed adequately in local and municipal forums right now, and I feel that my concept is exactly the kind of local and inter-local approach required to address issues of major import.

    If I’m to understand your comment correctly, it’s that my proposal is too isolated - that larger actions are required. Quite the opposite is true. Bringing a global issue to the doorstep of the middle-class, and gradually expanding that concept, is exactly what’s required to bring issues in the global forum right to your neighbours and friends. It would be so refreshing just to hear people debating these issues publicly outside their homes.

  7. Hi Matt,

    Thanks for this thoughtful and constructive response. I’ll try to write one of my own here (rather than just blurting out a couple more sentences).

    To be honest, I hadn’t given any substantial thought to how your ideas about municipality-centred organizing relate to that blog post I had linked to. The link was just something I threw in on the fly because the issues raised there are vaguely similar to what you wrote about — that is,
    Interventions at a more local level (e.g. municipalities; e.g. households)
    vs.
    Passive disengagement (e.g. apathy)

    Basically I think that in my previous comment (which was very brief), and in the writing in my blog post (most of which is just quotations from someone else’s article) the stance is supportive of more local interventions — including organizing around municipal governments — yet those statements also point out that those sorts of interventions can be too narrow some of the time. So that criticism only applies to some interventions that are more local (e.g. organized around municipal government).

    You certainly didn’t say anything about coalitions and wider causes and so on not mattering. So in relation to your post I think what I raised just adds to it rather than criticizing it; the message from me was along the lines of - ‘what you’re saying about municipal organizing sounds good; and coalitions and other larger-scale projects are important too, so let’s try to make sure to link this broader organizing to locally focused efforts.’ Evidently there already are some ties like that in the municipalities that you have in mind.

    I do think that some of what some progressives bring to city halls is much too narrow though. Here in London, Ontario I find that people trying to sway the municipal politicians and civil servants are in a sort of a bubble — a sort of activist niche that is very separate from other activism around here. Some people get acquainted with city hall (e.g. particular committees), while most others seem to have no (or almost no) sense of what’s going on there — including what’s going on in terms of activism. Out here there also isn’t much in the way of strong, organized ties with broader coalitions and such. There’s a vague sense of progressivism — which generally falls into certain categories, like environmentalism, helping poor people, etc — but it’s all very hazy. There are ties beyond this area (e.g. ties between a Post-Carbon London group and the Post-Carbon Institute), but I find that ties like those don’t amount to much around here. Nevertheless, it’s true that commonalities do link those local progressives with people elsewhere who have similar concerns and goals (e.g. environmentalism) — even when those people don’t talk to one another.

    My blog post probably misleadingly suggests that the approach that Peter Asmus encourages doesn’t involve any sort of broader movement or coalitions beyond a particular local area. Of course, global warming is something that various people in various places are concerned about; so in trying to proactively do something about global warming there is some connection between the people making that effort.

    Even so, if there isn’t deliberately and consciously unified organizing, some opportunities could be lost. With those stronger ties between projects (which are stronger, in part, because they would involve more contact with others in the coalition or movement) there’s more potential for synergy - in learning from one another; in sharing resources; etc. There’s also potential for unified campaigns - e.g. lobbying for common goals. There’s also potential for people to step on each other’s toes - e.g. while competing for volunteers.

    Yet, maintaining coalitions and such entails trade-offs (e.g. time put into e-mails and other communications) which could be counter-productive at times.

    However, it seems like — generally speaking — activism around this part of the world (when there is any at all) is far too rudderless and fragmented.

    By the way -
    I think that the Peter Asmus post I quoted from at my blog is partly about more private actions like home renovations, and gardening, and so on, which have the potential to be extremely scattered because they’re usually so private. The Peter Asmus post also is clearly about the sort of campaigns that you’re raising though — even as it’s about even smaller-scale interventions.

    So that’s my perspective on a lot of what you’ve said — but not all of it. (In particular, I have the last paragraph of your comment in mind.)

  8. I think we agree then Toban. I just sent an email out to get feedback on this municipal proposal, and hope to hold our first campaign in the summer of 2009. There’s only one way to find out if this idea will pay off!

  9. I have Bell’s Palsy and enjoy your blog very much. First time I’ve commented, but have been reading here and there.
    Great blog. I enjoy reading it every chance I get and value your opinions!

  10. I don’t think that the issue should be centered on the public’s apathy but rather on how to promote attendance @ said municipal council meetings and how( in what specific ways ) those that attend could engage and influence the agenda. It seems that we sometimes have seen that anyone who dares to actively engage/challenge /debate in political activity can be viewed as anti-gov’t or ? ….
    when you mention the guy who “incredibly well educated at McGill” it does suggest that that in other to get anywhere substantive that one really has to know…. their issue(s)…. maybe that’s obvious ? Or maybe the leaders in the city - in whatever field/discipline /area of interest - are too busy to see or know of what can be gained by watching municipal politics with as as much intensity as the far away US presidential election….?
    When are the council meetings held? where? They don’t publicize them enough …much to their satisfaction and our collective detriment.
    who thinks that city hall needs 10.5 million dollars worth of repairs? ?!? http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=7eb0050b-4c41-4318-8c64-539ecacac1ac

  11. [...] Matthew Brett at the Canadian Dimension blog -”Lighten up? Canada’s perilous and intolerable apathy” [...]

Leave a Comment

Progressive Bloggers Part of the Progressive Bloggers Network.

Top of page