Canadian Dimension - For people who want to change the world Subscribe Now!
CD blog

Haaretz Editor Refuses to Retract Israel Apartheid Statements

Chris Webb, July 31st, 2008

From Israel National News

Haaretz editor and board member Danny Rubinstein does not retract his categorization of Israel as an “apartheid state” before the UN. He claims many at Haaretz agree.

Rubinstein had addressed the UN’s Palestinian Rights Conference in Brussels on his way to a World Zionist Organization-sponsored speaking tour in Britain last week. His speaking engagement before the local Zionist Federation was cancelled due to the outcry over his statements, but a local Conservative synagogue hosted the lecture, sponsored by the New Israel Fund.

Some attendees expected Rubinstein to explain the context of his words, but when they offered him a chance to explain himself to the local Jewish community, he stubbornly stood by his statements.

“I am not apologizing for what I said,” the Haaretz editor said, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. “People do use the word apartheid in my circles. My newspaper increasingly uses that word. This is nothing new.”

Yisrael Medad, Vice Chairman of Israel’s Media Watch, commented on Rubenstein’s words: “The atmosphere that David Landau, chief editor of Haaretz, has created together with the paper’s owner Amos Schocken, has led what should have been Israel’s premier newspaper to adopt the terminology of the enemy and provide it with the most important instrument for victory: the kowtowing of Israel and Zionism before their onslaught.” “Haaretz seems no longer to be a newspaper, but perhaps an ideological ragsheet,” Medad added.

Rubinstein says he started using the word after former US President Jimmy Carter published his book “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.” Rubinstein said that he disliked the book, but argued: “Even [former Israeli Prime Minister] Ariel Sharon used the word ‘occupation,’ which was a word never used before…I have a professional responsibility to say what I think, and I won’t change what I say or what I think depending on the place.”

The UK Zionist Federation was scheduled to have Rubinstein address its annual assembly and Rubinstein’s trip, including his stopover in Brussles, was paid for by the World Zionist Organization. The UK Zionist Federation is an umbrella organization for more than 120 different British Jewish organizations.

The New Israel Fund funds several left-wing and Arab organizations in Israel like Adalah, Mossawa, the Arab Human Rights Association (HRA), Hamoked. The common trait of those receiving funding is working to end the status of Israel as a Jewish state. It also provides grants to radical groups that attack Jewish residents in Judea and Samaria and their property; and to groups who work to enable illegal Arab land-grabs around Jerusalem and elsewhere, such as the Israel Committe Against House Demolitions.

Rubinstein addressed the International Conference of Civil Society in Support of Israeli-Palestine Peace, as the UN conference was called, alongside several other participants who did use this “apartheid” status to call for a boycott of Israel. One of the speakers with whom he shared the dais was Clare Short, a notoriously anti-Israel British politician, who spoke about being led on tours of PA-controlled areas by the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD). ICAHD is funded by the New Israel Fund.

Zionist Federation Takes a Stand

Despite growing pressure from the large left-wing Jewish community in Britain, the Zionist Federation stood firm in its decision to bar Rubinstein from speaking. “The Anglo-Jewish community and other supporters of Israel have been fighting growing efforts by various British unions to boycott Israel, the latest being an attempt by the UK’s University and College Union to sever links with the Israeli academic community,” Gavin Gross, director of public affairs for the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland told the JTA. “By using the phrase ‘apartheid state’ to describe Israel, [the Haaretz editor] has provided legitimacy to the pro-boycott camp.”

Asked by the moderator at his London appearance whether he would also appear before the extreme-right British National Party, Rubinstein replied: “That analogy is not fair. This was the UN.”

Chris Webb Chris Webb is an activist and journalist living in Winnipeg. He is currently publishing assistant at Canadian Dimension. Read other posts by Chris Webb.

5 Comments

  1. You know, I thought we were maybe going to get a break from Matthew Brett’s continuous insipid Jew hatred on CD, but after seeing all the similar obsessive crap that Chris Webb is inflicting upon us, I guess not.

  2. First of all, this originally appeared on 09/05/07, almost a year ago.

    Secondly, this from a month ago:

    Between the lines: A ‘purge’ at Haaretz?

    Jun. 26, 2008
    Calev Ben-David , THE JERUSALEM POST
    What the heck is going on at Haaretz? If you believe some of the things being written about the paper on media Web sites here and abroad, it is nothing less than a political purge, a putsch, a deliberate weeding out of regular voices deemed too politically controversial.

    Why? Because its target readership is no longer the left-wing intelligentsia and bourgeoisie, but the investor and entrepreneurial class that read (and advertise in) its successful sister business daily, The Marker, and prefer a Haaretz (in the words of one of its critics) “without Palestinians or the underprivileged.”

    As a result, according to this scenario, such writers as Meron Rappaport, Gideon Levy, Amira Hass, Danny Rubinstein and Akiva Eldar, who have focused much of their work on the Palestinian issue, have either been forced out, encouraged to leave the paper or have had their writing space reduced or marginalized.

    In addition, reports recently circulated that the highly regarded social affairs reporter, Ruth Sinai, whose work has detailed the plight of the unemployed, was fired - and then had her dismissal rescinded this week.

    These changes are being carried by Haaretz’s new editor, Dov Alfon, who previously worked at The Marker under its boss, Guy Rolnick - widely regarded as the dominant editorial vision in the company - with the approval of publisher Amos Schocken, who now must also answer to the paper’s German co-owners, DuMont Schauberg.

    Both Alfon and Schocken have felt it necessary to respond to these charges, with the latter replying to the media Web site, The Seventh Eye: “I understand there are those readers who want Haaretz to look like a protest [manifesto] against the occupation - for example, Ashkenazi, secular and righteous, and focused on the occupation. But a newspaper is not a protest [manifesto]; it’s a newspaper. By the way, Haaretz was against the occupation before Amira Hass and Meron [Rappaport], and it will be after them. And don’t misunderstand me. I am certainly of the view that the occupation is Israel’s most severe ailment, one that endangers its very existence. If it were possible, then, I would be ready to be the publisher of a newspaper that solely campaigned against the occupation till its end. The problem is that some of those protesting against the occupation also want to know what is happening in the shops of Comme Il Faut [a clothing chain]. So we were concerned that they wouldn’t take out a subscription to the newspaper that I am prepared to be the publisher of.”

    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1214492516011

  3. To be honest, I would prefer that Yisrael Medad refrain from posting on this site. Someone who refers to a young Israeli woman as the “babbling whore of Palestine” might do better on a misogyny blog or a “settler supremacist” site.

  4. In response to Hugh’s comment. First, let me remind you that I clearly did not write this article, as is indicated at the beginning. Second, if you are at all familiar with the magazines line on the occupation of Palestine then you wouldn’t be surprised that our blogs reflected this view of Israel as a settler state, brutally holding Palestinians prisoner on their towns and villages.

    Finally, Hugh, I am South African, and I have studied the political and psychological character of apartheid. As comrade Ronnie Kasrils, an anti-apartheid activist, noted on a trip through the occupied territories, “Travelling into Palestine’s West Bank and Gaza Strip, which I visited recently, is like a surreal trip back into an apartheid state of emergency.”

    While there are major economic and labour discrepancies between Israeli apartheid and South African, the term evokes the same racist, settler mentality that is unacceptable in this world.

  5. I never said that Chris wrote the article. But that’s neither here nor there.

    Unfortunately, there are too many differences between your African apartheid and what’s at issue here.

    So tell us please, did the Blacks of South Africa have a declared intention to exterminate all of their white neighbors? Did the Blacks blow up buses and cafes and slaughter children in day care centres and schools, or randomly fire missiles at civilians in order to terrorize them? Or did they transports arms and fighters in ambulances to wreak havoc and then call for immunity, declaring themselves oppressed? Did Black parents ever send their children to throw stones at the white’s tanks and soldiers HOPING that they might be gunned down and so be made into martyrs for their cause???

    The separation wall between the Jews and the Palestinians is actually a passive, almost peaceful means of assuring some kind of modicum of protection from the irregular warfare that has been a tactic of the Palestinians against the Jews.

    And speaking of apartheid, Chris, how many Jews are ALLOWED to live in Arab countries? How many Jews live in Gaza??? The West Bank?

    EXACTLY NONE.

    How many Arabs live in Israel? They are a sixth of the population of 7 million.

    Do they have separate hospitals? No.

    Do they have to leave town at night? No.

Leave a Comment

Progressive Bloggers Part of the Progressive Bloggers Network.

Top of page